In the construction industry, tendering strategies are crucial in determining how projects are awarded to contractors. Selecting the most appropriate strategy can directly impact the project’s cost, quality, and timely completion. This article will delve into the different tendering routes available, their alignment with the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Plan of Work, and the processes involved in tendering. We will also explore key issues and considerations when tendering, equipping construction professionals, quantity surveyors (QSs), and students with the knowledge to make informed decisions.
Introduction to the Tendering Process
Tendering is a competitive process in which contractors submit bids for carrying out specific construction work. It differs from procurement, which encompasses the broader process of acquiring goods and services. While procurement involves strategic decision-making about how and from whom goods and services will be obtained, tendering focuses primarily on obtaining prices and selecting contractors based on their bids.
The timing of tendering activity is essential to ensure contractors have the required time and information to prepare accurate bids. Tendering can occur at different stages of a project, depending on the chosen strategy and procurement route. A well-timed tender can prevent unnecessary delays and ensure that the selected contractor is equipped to deliver the project within the required timeframe.
Single-Stage vs. Two-Stage Tendering
There are two primary tendering methods in construction: single-stage and two-stage tendering. Each offers advantages depending on the project’s complexity, timeline, and specific requirements.
Single-Stage Tendering
Single-stage tendering is the more traditional approach and involves contractors submitting a complete and final bid based on full project documentation. This method is typically used in straightforward projects where the design is fully developed at the time of tender. Contractors are invited to bid after RIBA Stage 4 (Technical Design), ensuring they have comprehensive information to produce accurate cost estimates.
Advantages:
- Competitive pricing as all contractors bid based on the same detailed information.
- Reduces the risk of scope changes during the construction phase since the design is finalised.
Disadvantages:
- May require more time to complete as the project team must fully develop the design before tendering.
- Little opportunity for contractor input in the early design stages, which can lead to missed opportunities for value engineering or innovation.
Two-Stage Tendering
Two-stage tendering is increasingly popular for complex or time-sensitive projects. The first stage involves selecting a preferred contractor based on preliminary costings and their suitability for the project, such as team experience, and profit margins. In the second stage, the contractor collaborates with the design team to finalise the design and produce a more accurate price.
Advantages:
- Enables early contractor involvement, which can enhance buildability and reduce risks associated with design errors.
- Speeds up the process by allowing design and tendering activities to overlap.
Disadvantages:
- Less competitive pressure during the second stage, as the contractor has already been selected.
- Can result in higher costs due to the reduced competition at the later stages of tendering.
Deciding on the Appropriate Tendering Strategy
Choosing the right tendering strategy is critical to the success of a construction project. Several factors influence this decision:
- Project Complexity: Complex projects benefit from early contractor involvement through two-stage tendering, allowing for specialist input during design development.
- Time Constraints: If there is pressure to begin work on-site quickly, a two-stage tendering process allows for overlapping design and construction activities.
- Client Objectives: The client’s priorities in terms of cost certainty, quality, and speed will influence the choice of tendering strategy.
- Market Conditions: In times of market uncertainty, negotiating with a single contractor may provide more stability than an open competitive process.
The Tendering Process: Step-by-Step
Regardless of the chosen strategy, certain key steps are followed during the tendering process to ensure a fair and transparent selection of contractors:
- Preparation of Tender Documents: The project team prepares detailed tender documents, which typically include the scope of work, specifications, and form of contract. These documents serve as the basis for contractors to prepare their bids.
- Issuing the Invitation to Tender (ITT): The ITT is sent to a list of pre-qualified contractors, who are given a specific timeframe to submit their tenders.
- Tender Period: During this time, contractors study the tender documents, raise any queries they have, and prepare their bids. It’s crucial to allow sufficient time for contractors to develop comprehensive and competitive bids.
- Receiving and Opening Tenders: Tenders are submitted by the deadline and opened in a formal manner to ensure transparency. The tenders are then evaluated based on cost, quality, and other predetermined criteria.
- Post-Tender Interviews: Interviews with contractors may be conducted to clarify aspects of their bids and assess their suitability for the project.
- Tender Evaluation and Selection: The project team evaluates the tenders using a scoring system that balances price and quality. Once a preferred contractor is selected, a recommendation is made to the client.
- Contract Award: The successful contractor is formally notified, and contract negotiations begin. Once terms are finalised, the contract is signed, and the contractor is appointed to carry out the works.
Key Considerations When Tendering
Tendering strategies should not be selected in isolation but aligned with the overall procurement strategy and project objectives. The following issues are essential considerations during the tendering process:
- Risk Management: Contractors may include risk premiums in their tenders if they perceive significant project risks, such as incomplete designs or challenging site conditions. Two-stage tendering can mitigate some of these risks by allowing contractors to provide input during the design phase.
- Market Conditions: The state of the construction market affects contractor pricing. During periods of high demand, contractors may submit higher bids due to their limited capacity.
- Transparency and Fairness: Ensuring transparency throughout the tender process is vital to avoid accusations of unfairness or corruption. All tenderers should receive the same information, and queries should be answered uniformly.
- Value Engineering: The tender process offers an opportunity for value engineering, where contractors propose alternative solutions to reduce costs or improve the project’s overall quality.
Conclusion
In conclusion, selecting the right tendering strategy is integral to the successful delivery of a construction project. The choice between single-stage and two-stage tendering depends on the project’s complexity, timeline, and the client’s objectives. Construction professionals and QSs must carefully consider factors such as market conditions, risk management, and the need for contractor involvement when deciding on the best tendering approach. Ultimately, a well-structured tendering process ensures a competitive, fair, and transparent selection of contractors, helping to achieve the desired project outcomes.
Leave a Reply